26 Jun 2025 02:59:41
Out of all the strikers linked who would we prefer. Foreign acquisitions possibly are talented but no prem experience. For me it's got to be muniz.
26 Jun 2025 11:58:32
Totally agree re Muniz, for all of the reasons I've given in previous posts!
26 Jun 2025 15:15:13
Agree guys but it's going to take eye watering dosh, maybe best to invest elsewhere?
26 Jun 2025 17:34:27
I heard they want 50 million, he is not worth that. The 49ners won’t be held to ransom anx over pay like the last lot.
26 Jun 2025 17:52:35
I'd take him, but we definitely don't want to be paying over the odds.
26 Jun 2025 18:09:55
Fulham now saying he is simply not for sale. Don't think this one is negotiating tactics, just not wanting to sell to us.
26 Jun 2025 18:10:04
This is not a Pistol packin’ Pete story, the price is too high.
26 Jun 2025 19:45:20
We can get better strikers on the continent for much less. His price is too high artificially because Fulham are worried about helping competition. Move on, then tell muniz to cram it when he tries to move to us next season.
27 Jun 2025 01:16:04
50 def too high?.
27 Jun 2025 07:36:29
can’t see us paying that, thought 30mil was high but now? 50mil
i’d prefer to spend that on either Beto or Kristovic
and macatee, 2 players for around 50.
27 Jun 2025 11:59:53
100% Melbo!
10 Jul 2025 01:00:07
Yes guys totally agree what’s said muniz 50 million when Fulham paid 8/ 10 for him, Beto for 20 better player and would only cost 20 million, kristovic is a definite no, and we could pay 25 million for Macateer, to young and wouldn’t last full season in premiership also you will not see 49ers spending 50 million on no one, Leeds must buy bargains I think like if someone plays in 2/ 3 positions like the guy diouf we were linked with but they wanted 20 million for him so Leeds got well away from that one, it’s starting to be a little disappointing by Leeds hierarchy.