10 Oct 2025 00:59:03
You've got to give the smarts to Ange. Why bother winning games and having to work for his money. Why not lose them all. Work for three months and get paid for three years.
10 Oct 2025 07:57:48
Genius Aus, but there’s also hold my beer Ange, Graham Potter, signing on bonus and 5 year deal going from Brighton to Chelsea, 3 year deal at Wet Sham, worked around a year for seven years income, nice work if you err don’t want to work for it.
10 Oct 2025 08:43:13
Ange Postecoglou could be sacked around the same time as Farke if results do not favour either coach, he plays our brand of football like Russell Martin, thoughts?
10 Oct 2025 10:58:25
Opti. Spoiler of a jovial post ?
But seeing you bought it up.
No wins from next three and they gone. And forest got it tough.
10 Oct 2025 11:30:05
Graham Potter available also if offered the Leeds job, thoughts?
Nuno also possibly available in a few months when West Ham fans find out he’s too much like David Moyes, not our style of football but could be available by Christmas, thoughts?
10 Oct 2025 12:08:40
Thoughts OP - no and no in that order!
10 Oct 2025 19:28:58
Potter is a good coach but not for a team potentially fighting relegation. His ideas seem to take ages for the team to get used to.
10 Oct 2025 22:31:12
Just stick with Farke.
If he has been given a striker who could convert we would be in the top 4.
11 Oct 2025 01:32:30
Very true mot. Or at least euro spot.
11 Oct 2025 09:49:35
I'm guessing the tongue is partially in the cheek again there OP. Either way, I wouldn't touch either. If no one has patience for Farke, I dread to think of the clamour for sackings from day 1 of either of those!
11 Oct 2025 11:35:42
Indeed Bright, just testing what the general consensus is on here now concerning Farke. Seems to have gone quiet for the moment, but I image that’s only until we lose our next game.
I imagine by the end of November there’ll be several sackings going on and I’m certain that Farke will be one of the main contenders.
Not saying that because I want him sacked, on the contrary I want him to complete this season come what may.
But because we will in my opinion be batting at the bottom part of the league, for a number of Leeds fans I’m sure, it will not be satisfactory enough for them and they will be wanting Farke sacked.
A sense of entitlement perhaps? Maybe marginal survival is not acceptable also?
11 Oct 2025 12:08:24
It’s about his performance with what he has. Learning by his obvious errors and selection. If we lose lose lose and nothing changes. Damn right he should go. He was dealt a bad hand pretty much in window. Few Goods a few bads. But. He has to learn by his errors.
11 Oct 2025 17:26:36
How many games does he have to lose to go?
He’s won two drawn two and lost three, is that not enough loses already to be sacked?
How do you define lose, lose, lose? Is that three loses?
Don’t think he’s been dealt a bad hand, the club spent its maximum within PSR, we’ve beefed up the defense and midfield which was desperately needed.
We weren’t allowed to spend 200Mill on x amount of attackers and most of the players we’ve bought are adapting well and improving.
So I don’t see a bad hand being dealt!
If we lose against Burnley for example, should he be sacked?