Leeds Rumours Archive October 11 2014

 

Use our rumours form to send us leeds transfer rumours.

11 Oct 2014 09:42:03
Mail reporting that FL are to charge Cellino with refusing to hand over copy of Judges tax evasion case result. They have run out of patience as they can't get their own copy and it seems Cellino's Italian lawyer won't hand it over.

Believable8 Unbelievable29

Under italian law the football league have no right to see the report, that's why they can't get a copy. Here we go again the football league thinking there above the law, so they can get rid of leeds united

Agree3 Disagree0

Mail just raking over the coals, rules state Cellino has to tell them of any changes to his circumstances that affect his standing. If he has not told them they have to assume nothing has changed, they can't punish him for anything. The story of the judges wording is just that a story. only Coco knows what it says and he would not leak it.

Agree0 Disagree0

I said earlier in the week that I didn't think Charles Sale liked us much. However if he (and the FL) think this is an acceptable route to go down, they are on dangerous ground. By the by, why anyone would find the post unbelievable is beyond me.

Agree0 Disagree0

Get ready for a counter suit by Cellino then he's already 1-0 against the FL this time take em for millions as well lol would be good eh?

Agree3 Disagree0

11 Oct 2014 15:34:05
Flipper - Well said - I was only reporting what's in the press today - so why do people disbelieve something that's in the national media for all to see!

Agree1 Disagree0

The FL would be entering new ground here so in some ways bring it on I say. I say that cause I do believe in our commercial justice and I can't see the FL rules being tight enough here to force a sale of Leeds which would mean a loss to MC.

As our laws always favour rich people who own stuff then FL would have its work cut out, also their motivation on this must be called into question f it put the club in danger, any legal eagle will have a field day on this you would think

Agree1 Disagree0

Who knows? It will be interesting to see what Mr. Sale has to say tomorrow .

Agree1 Disagree0

Was not saying I don't believe it but the only person who has access to the report is Massimos Italian lawyer and I doubt if he would leak what it says to the mail. I think the mail is speculating what it says to stir up trouble. I believe the FL want it but their rules state he only needs to inform them if something has changed to his circumstances that affect his fit and proper status. At the moment no one knows it has. If the lawyers are appealing the decision then it still has not. The judgement has been released for ages and if the FL thought they were on solid ground they would have been all over Massimo by now

Agree1 Disagree0

Ny the way did the mail not run the story about Iranian money buying Leeds that they admitted in the article that they had no evidence of and was basically heresay

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Oct 2014 00:32:12
Apparently Adler & Jewish consortium confirmed as owning ER. As for surrounding land, here we go again

Believable5 Unbelievable5

11 Oct 2014 09:44:07
whos in the jewish consortium

Agree0 Disagree0

Pappa Smurf owns ER, don't be fooled if its under the name of teak holdings ltd or any other name or consortium.
Hes no fool, just a averisious old toot
He still owns a room at the Chelski and WILL NOT sell it, hence the reason why Chelski cannot extend part of the ground.

Agree1 Disagree0

Andy you're wrong, Mr 9300 miles knows who owns ER now & it is Jacob Adler & fiends, names unknown atm. I think we all thought it was Bates & Co & maybe wanted it to be but for once Birdseye is not guilty.
No Cellino has a few weeks to do the deal or look even worse than he already does atm. Brining Bates back into Lufc & then not buying ER are going to create a backlash with manysupporters. I truly hope he knows what he's doing & is not playing us

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Oct 2014 17:19:40
Slough
Tell ya what mate I won't argue with ya but name your price and I will match it!
Bates fingers are in ER trust me.

Agree0 Disagree0

If you don't know the members of the consortium how can you say it has nothing to do with Bates. I am not saying it is Bates because I don't know but would bet he is in there somewhere. Most of his enterprises are based in the caymans and have a front guy so no one knows what he is involved in.

Agree0 Disagree0

I take your point guys & until I was told by certain people I would have said exactly the same. If I'm honest I still struggle to believe it but am forced to simply because of the source being so genuine. As for who the others are, it just stated Bates definitely isn't chaps. Square ball confirmed said piece afterwards too & I know he's not everyones cuppa tea I have no reason to doubt it.
All in all it makes life much easier for MC to get the deal done now. Let's wait n see guys MOT

Agree0 Disagree0

Yes it is owned by jacob adler there is a consortium, adler is jewish, I don't understand why the religion of the consortium has to be mentioned, it doesn't mention bates is a catholic and so on

Agree0 Disagree0

I mentioned jewish as that's how the news broke. Don't get why this appears to upset people but hey each to their own opinion I suppose. Might be because Bates is well known enough not to put him in a religious category however we find categorising in many things, doesn't imply anything other than a jewish community own ER and headed by Adler. If you want to push the envelope further count me out. I'm only about lufc MOT

Agree0 Disagree0

I do not know if it upsets people, it does not sit well with me, the two best chairman in terms of silverware were manny cussins and leslie silver did anyone mention they are both jewish, you said it in terms of religion, instead of jewish consortium, you should say manchester consortium, religion has nothing to do with it

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - to be fair, and that is the only reason I didn't remove the word from the initial post, every report I had read said the same thing in the papers. I also am not sure why they mention that, it does seem completely irrelevant. Though I suppose they would say it is as relevant as talking about a Chinese consortium or Manchester consortium.}

To be fair a chinese person is from china a jewish person can be from england, ireland, america, holland, the same as a christian, its areligion not a nationality

Agree0 Disagree0