Leeds banter 37484

 

Use our rumours form to send us leeds transfer rumours.



16 Aug 2017 10:58:21
Right for team that will play Sunderland. I will go for this/ Wiedwald, Ayling, Jansson, Cooper Borthwick-Jackson, Bridcutt (he will have a huge point to prove against Sunderland. this is the reason I am picking him, as think he will give 150% in this match! ) Phillips (is the only CM we have that likes to attack the box) Hernandez, Saiz, Dallas, Wood. What are your thoughts, and who would you change/why? MOT

Agree0 Disagree2

16 Aug 2017 12:13:41
I wouldn't drop shaugnessy, or O'Kane, both were great vs Fulham.

16 Aug 2017 12:44:21
They were good, not great

16 Aug 2017 17:38:58
I would change Phillips, have him on the bench .

16 Aug 2017 17:56:50
Still think drop Hernandez for another cm, my kiltch? just gives us a bit more to battle with in the middle

16 Aug 2017 18:28:40
I think Hernandez could play as a deeper midfielder, next to O'Kane. With Dallas, Saiz and Alioski behind Wood. Or just play 433. Midfield, O'Kane, Phillips, Hernandez. Attack, Alioski, Wood, Saiz. Just a bit sick of the 4231 tbh.

16 Aug 2017 18:54:07
A man of my own thinking vinny. Is Pablo just a bit light weight for deeper mid though?

16 Aug 2017 23:39:36
Totally agree with Vinny I hate this 4-2-3-1, too predictable and it leaves huge space as Fulham showed to get at the back 4! Regardless of wood staying or going we need another forward or 2 in to help lighten the burden on Woody! But look for something different someone who can play off the shoulder turn n run at a defender . Whatever happens I don't expect Woody to be here come September

17 Aug 2017 08:29:10
TC used to favour 4 3 3 previously so I'm hoping for a switch back when we're a bit more settled.

17 Aug 2017 10:22:25
4231 isn't doing us a massive amount of favours in home matches, in my opinion. If the idea is to play aggressive possession football, I'd rather see a 4-1-2-1-2. Think putting Alioski or Ekuban as second striker would be worth a go. Away from home, 4-2-3-1 might be a better option. Haven't really seen a workable plan B from TC, yet.







 

 

 
Log In or Register to post

User
Pass
Remember me

Forgot Pass